Skip to content
COOEY
FAIL // HALL OF SHAME
2512 players ranked

Security failures of FedRAMP vendors, their competitors, and the hardware they ship — ranked by zero-days, RCE, active exploitation, sheer embarrassment, and False-Claims-Act recoveries. A dex.sgc.ai RAG curator writes each event's summary and scores how avoidable it was; every name links to its dossier.

☣ Most embarrassing
Ranked by how avoidable and reputation-shredding their worst failure was — the dex curator's grounded 0–100 verdict.
841
shame 35
35shame
842
rt-ax56u v2 product
shame 35
35shame
843 35shame
844
via go2 product
shame 35
35shame
845
dbi product
shame 35
35shame
846
bioaccess ivs product
shame 35
35shame
847
dir-615 t1 product
shame 35
35shame
848
shame 35
35shame
849 35shame
850
shame 35
35shame
851
shame 35
35shame
852
shame 35
35shame
853
erpnext product
shame 35
35shame
854
shame 35
35shame
855
mahavitaran product
shame 35
35shame
856
4st l-bems product
shame 35
35shame
857
shame 35
35shame
858
shame 35
35shame
859
shame 35
35shame
860
shame 35
35shame
861
shame 35
35shame
862
httpx product
shame 35
35shame
863
shame 35
35shame
864 35shame
865
shame 35
35shame
866
shame 35
35shame
867
tiptel ip 286 product
shame 35
35shame
868
rt-ax58u product
shame 35
35shame
869
shame 35
35shame
870
novel-plus product
shame 35
35shame
871
ags-zena product
shame 35
35shame
872
n600r firmware product
shame 35
35shame
873
osticket product
shame 35
35shame
874
shame 35
35shame
875
4diac forte product
shame 35
35shame
876
shame 35
35shame
877
shame 35
35shame
878
shame 35
35shame
879
shame 35
35shame
880 35shame
◀ PREV PAGE 22 / 25 NEXT ▶