COOEY // HUBcompliance · community · intelligence

FAIL // hall of shame

The security failures of FedRAMP vendors, their competitors, and the hardware they ship — ranked by zero-days, remote code execution, active exploitation, sheer embarrassment, and False-Claims-Act recoveries. A dex.sgc.ai RAG curator writes each event's summary and scores how avoidable the failure was; every name links to its dossier.

726
on the board
1
zero-days
243
RCEs
102
exploited
554
assessed
$82M
FCA recovered
Overview☣ Most embarrassing◐ Most zero-days⚡ Most RCEs⌖ Most exploited⚖ Biggest FCA recoveries
All playersCompaniesVendorsProducts / HW ◧ FedRAMP only

☣ Most embarrassing

Ranked by how avoidable and reputation-shredding their worst failure was — the dex curator's grounded 0–100 verdict.

  1. 401
    shame 25
    25shame
  2. 402
    shame 25
    25shame
  3. 403
    shame 25
    25shame
  4. 404
    openssh product
    shame 25
    25shame
  5. 405
    forge product
    shame 25
    25shame
  6. 406
    fortimanager product
    shame 25
    25shame
  7. 407
    fortiweb product
    shame 25
    25shame
  8. 408
    shame 25
    25shame
  9. 409
    fortirecorder product
    shame 25
    25shame
  10. 410
    fortivoice product
    shame 25
    25shame
  11. 411
    moveit transfer product
    shame 20
    20shame
  12. 412
    devops velocity product
    shame 20
    20shame
  13. 413
    azure synapse product
    shame 20
    20shame
  14. 414
    shame 20
    20shame
  15. 415
    fortianalyzer product
    shame 20
    20shame
◄ prev page 11 / 11 next ► · 415 total